Int J Stomatol ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 367-372.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022018
• Reviews • Previous Articles
CLC Number:
1 | Parikh M, Kishan KV, Solanki NP, et al. Efficacy of removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from root canals by endoactivator and endovac irrigation techniques: a systematic review of in vitro studies[J]. Contemp Clin Dent, 2019, 10(1): 135-142. |
2 | Uzunoglu-Özyürek E, Erdoğan Ö, Aktemur Türker S. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the dentinal tubule penetration of 2 different root canal sealers: a confocal laser scanning microscopic study[J]. J Endod, 2018, 44(6): 1018-1023. |
3 | Tamil S, Andamuthu SA, Vaiyapuri R, et al. A comparative evaluation of intracanal calcium hydroxide removal with hand file, rotary file, and passive ultrasonic irrigation: an in vitro study[J]. J Pharm Bioallied Sci, 2019, 11(Suppl 2): S442-S445. |
4 | Alturaiki S, Lamphon H, Edrees H, et al. Efficacy of 3 different irrigation systems on removal of cal-cium hydroxide from the root canal: a scanning electron microscopic study[J]. J Endod, 2015, 41(1): 97-101. |
5 | Denna J, Shafie LA, Alsofi L, et al. Efficacy of the rotary instrument XP-endo finisher in the removal of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament in combination with different irrigation techniques: a microtomographic study[J]. Materials (Basel), 2020, 13(10): E2222. |
6 | Chawla A, Kumar V. Evaluating the efficacy of different techniques and irrigation solutions for removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal system: a scanning electron microscope study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2018, 21(4): 394-400. |
7 | Li DX, Jiang S, Yin XZ, et al. Efficacy of needle, ultrasonic, and endoactivator irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming in removing calcium hydroxide from the main canal and isthmus: an in vitro micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy study[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2015, 33(6): 330-337. |
8 | Ma JZ, Shen Y, Al-Ashaw AJ, et al. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the removal of calcium hydroxide medicament from C-shaped root canals of mandibular second molars[J]. Int Endod J, 2015, 48(4): 333-341. |
9 | Wang Y, Guo LY, Fang HZ, et al. An in vitro study on the efficacy of removing calcium hydroxide from curved root canal systems in root canal therapy[J]. Int J Oral Sci, 2017, 9(2): 110-116. |
10 | Jung IY, Seo MA, Fouad AF, et al. Apical anatomy in mesial and mesiobuccal roots of permanent first molars[J]. J Endod, 2005, 31(5): 364-368. |
11 | Haghanifar S, Moudi E, Madani Z, et al. Evaluation of the prevalence of complete isthmii in permanent teeth using cone-beam computed tomography[J]. I-ran Endod J, 2017, 12(4): 426-431. |
12 | Fava LR, Saunders WP. Calcium hydroxide pastes: classification and clinical indications[J]. Int Endod J, 1999, 32(4): 257-282. |
13 | Lim MJ, Jang HJ, Yu MK, et al. Removal efficacy and cytotoxicity of a calcium hydroxide paste using N-2-methyl-pyrrolidone as a vehicle[J]. Restor Dent Endod, 2017, 42(4): 290-300. |
14 | Lins PD, Nogueira BC, Fagundes NC, et al. Analysis of the effectiveness of calcium hydroxide removal with variation of technique and solvent vehicles[J]. Indian J Dent Res, 2015, 26(3): 304-308. |
15 | Nandini S, Velmurugan N, Kandaswamy D. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament with two calcium chelators: volumetric analysis using spiral CT, an in vitro study[J]. J Endod, 2006, 32(11): 1097-1101. |
16 | Lambrianidis T, Margelos J, Beltes P. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide dressing from the root canal[J]. J Endod, 1999, 25(2): 85-88. |
17 | Kourti E, Pantelidou O. Comparison of different agitation methods for the removal of calcium hydroxide from the root canal: scanning electron microscopy study[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017, 20(6): 439-444. |
18 | Kirar DS, Jain P, Patni P. Comparison of different irrigation and agitation methods for the removal of two types of calcium hydroxide medicaments from the root canal wall: an in-vitro study[J]. Clujul Med, 2017, 90(3): 327-332. |
19 | Nasab Mobarakeh NM, Taheri A, Rahmanian H, et al. Effect of various irrigating devices on the removal of two different forms of calcium hydroxide from internal resorption cavities[J]. Int J Dent, 2020, 2020: 8881177. |
20 | Pabel AK, Hülsmann M. Comparison of different techniques for removal of calcium hydroxide from straight root canals: an in vitro study[J]. Odontology, 2017, 105(4): 453-459. |
21 | Harzivartyan S, Hazar AB, Kartal N, et al. Evaluation of different irrigation solutions and activation methods on removing calcium hydroxide[J]. J Dent Sci, 2021, 16(2): 700-705. |
22 | Wiseman A, Cox TC, Paranjpe A, et al. Efficacy of sonic and ultrasonic activation for removal of calcium hydroxide from mesial canals of mandibular molars: a microtomographic study[J]. J Endod, 2011, 37(2): 235-238. |
23 | Kumar P, de Ataide IN, Fernandes M, et al. A cone-beam computed tomography assessment of the efficacy of different irrigation devices for removal of silicone oil-based calcium hydroxide from root canal system[J]. J Conserv Dent, 2017, 20(2): 68-71. |
24 | Al-Hiyasat AS, Alfirjani SA. The effect of obturation techniques on the push-out bond strength of a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer[J]. J Dent, 2019, 89: 103169. |
25 | Zhang W, Li Z, Peng B. Assessment of a new root canal sealer’s apical sealing ability[J]. Oral Surg O-ral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009, 107(6): e79-e82. |
26 | Machado MEL, Veintimilla Lozada VN, Carrillo Rengifo KJ, et al. Confocal laser scanning microscopic analysis of the penetration of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules after calcium hydroxide dressing[J]. Aust Endod J, 2021. doi: 10.1111/aej.12508. Epub ahead of print. |
27 | Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide[J]. J Endod, 1999, 25(6): 431-433. |
28 | Cruz ATG, Grecca FS, Piasecki L, et al. Influence of the calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on dentinal tubule penetration of two root canal sealers[J]. Eur Endod J, 2017, 2(1): 1-6. |
29 | Ghabraei S, Bolhari B, Yaghoobnejad F, et al. Effect of intra-canal calcium hydroxide remnants on the push-out bond strength of two endodontic sealers[J]. Iran Endod J, 2017, 12(2): 168-172. |
30 | Barbizam JV, Trope M, Teixeira EC, et al. Effect of calcium hydroxide intracanal dressing on the bond strength of a resin-based endodontic sealer[J]. Braz Dent J, 2008, 19(3): 224-227. |
31 | Guiotti FA, Kuga MC, Duarte MA, et al. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on push-out bond streng-th of endodontic sealers to root canal dentin[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2014, 28: 25006626. |
32 | Donnermeyer D, Wyrsch H, Bürklein S, et al. Removal of calcium hydroxide from artificial grooves in straight root canals: sonic activation using EDDY versus passive ultrasonic irrigation and XPendo finisher[J]. J Endod, 2019, 45(3): 322-326. |
33 | Kim SK, Kim YO. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication on apical seal[J]. Int Endod J, 2002, 35(7): 623-628. |
34 | Böttcher DE, Hirai VH, Da Silva Neto UX, et al. Effect of calcium hydroxide dressing on the long-term sealing ability of two different endodontic sealers: an in vitro study[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2010, 110(3): 386-389. |
35 | Margelos J, Eliades G, Verdelis C, et al. Interaction of calcium hydroxide with zinc oxide-eugenol type sealers: a potential clinical problem[J]. J Endod, 1997, 23(1): 43-48. |
36 | Sireesha A, Jayasree R, Vidhya S, et al. Comparative evaluation of micron-and nano-sized intracanal medicaments on penetration and fracture resistance of root dentin-an in vitro study[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2017, 104(Pt B): 1866-1873. |
37 | Zarei M, Afkhami F, Malek Poor Z. Fracture resistance of human root dentin exposed to calcium hydroxide intervisit medication at various time periods: an in vitro study[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2013, 29(2): 156-160. |
38 | Doyon GE, Dumsha T, von Fraunhofer JA. Fracture resistance of human root dentin exposed to intracanal calcium hydroxide[J]. J Endod, 2005, 31(12): 895-897. |
39 | Andreasen JO, Farik B, Munksgaard EC. Long-term calcium hydroxide as a root canal dressing may increase risk of root fracture[J]. Dent Traumatol, 2002, 18(3): 134-137. |
40 | Nerwich A, Figdor D, Messer HH. pH changes in root dentin over a 4-week period following root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide[J]. J Endod, 1993, 19(6): 302-306. |
41 | Whitbeck ER, Quinn GD, Quinn JB. Effect of calcium hydroxide on the fracture resistance of dentin[J]. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol, 2011, 116(4): 743-749. |
42 | Shetty S, Kahler SL, Kahler B. Alkaline material effects on roots of teeth[J]. Materials (Basel), 2017, 10(12): E1412. |
43 | Yassen GH, Vail MM, Chu TG, et al. The effect of medicaments used in endodontic regeneration on root fracture and microhardness of radicular dentine[J]. Int Endod J, 2013, 46(7): 688-695. |
44 | Marques-da-Silva B, Alberton CS, Tomazinho FSF, et al. Effectiveness of five instruments when removing calcium hydroxide paste from simulated internal root resorption cavities in extracted maxillary central incisors[J]. Int Endod J, 2020, 53(3): 366-375. |
45 | Li DX, Jiang S, Yin XZ, et al. Efficacy of needle, ultrasonic, and endoactivator irrigation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming in removing calcium hydroxide from the main canal and isthmus: an in vitro micro-computed tomography and scanning electron microscopy study[J]. Photomed Laser Surg, 2015, 33(6): 330-337. |
[1] | Lin Jie,Liu Fan. Exploration on cleaning and disinfection mode of dental instruments based on multi-enzyme detergent control [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(3): 324-327. |
[2] | Ji Xiao,Jing Fangqi,Li Ya,Xue Jing. Data simulation optimization of root canal preparation sequence [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 37-47. |
[3] | He Rong,Liu Xuejun,Zhou Yukun. Systematic review on the effect of photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming in endodontic irrigation [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(6): 644-655. |
[4] | Li Mixuezi,Zhang Chen. Clinical consideration on the application of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing endocrown in molar restoration after root canal therapy [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(3): 274-279. |
[5] | Tan Kaixuan,Li Fan,Zhang Lijuan,Li Shanshan,Lu Jie,Zhang Ying,Yang Fang. Root canal retreatment with subcutaneous emphysema: a case report [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(5): 563-566. |
[6] | Yi Jianru,Luo Mengqi,Yin Yijia,Liu Zhiqing,Liu Qian,Shi Yongle,Yang Zheng,Liu Fan,Han Xianglong. The strategy to reduce the risk of novel coronavirus pneumonia transmission via aerosol in dental practice [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(3): 362-365. |
[7] | Xu Qing’an,Fan Mingwen. Non-instrumental technique and multi-acoustic ultra-clean system for root-canal treatment [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(5): 522-525. |
[8] | Jia Zhuoqun, Yang Lu.. Factors influencing the clearance efficiency of root canal disinfectant calcium hydroxide [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(4): 439-443. |
[9] | Huang Lidong, Gong Weiyu, Dong Yanmei.. Research progress on root canal irrigation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(4): 465-472. |
[10] | Li Ruhuang, Wang Xiao.. Research progress on prognosis factors of endodontic surgery [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(6): 721-724. |
[11] | Zou Huiru, Qin Zongchang. Research progress on root canal configuration of mandibular anterior teeth [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(3): 325-328. |
[12] | Long Yunzi, Zheng Chunyan, Wang Zuhua. Comparison of various irrigation methods on the removal efficacy of calcium hydroxide from root canal [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(2): 233-238. |
[13] | Xie Kexian, Wang Xiao, Li Yuangao, Zhang Ping.. Treatment of internal root resorption with calcific mass deposition [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(6): 628-630. |
[14] | Shen Yanxin, Feng Yuchao, Ren Jie, Liang Yajing, Yin Shihai.. Effect factors of the removal of the calcium hydroxide from the root canals by ultrasonic irrigation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(4): 483-486. |
[15] | Tan Yongmei, Zhao Shaoping, Yan Wenjuan, Zhang Hailan, Lü Wenjie, Zhou Lijuan. Comparison of short period postoperative clinical efficacy between single-visit root canal treatment and two-visit root canal treatment [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(3): 277-280. |