Int J Stomatol

Int J Stomatol ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (5): 536-540.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021071

• Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Association between ponticulus posticus and maxillary palatally impacted canine: a cone-beam computed tomography study

Tian Haonan(),Lin Min,Xie Congman,Ren Aishu()   

  1. Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University & Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences & Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Received:2021-01-12 Revised:2021-05-21 Online:2021-09-01 Published:2021-09-10
  • Contact: Aishu Ren E-mail:2018110857@stu.cqmu.edu.cn;500220@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing in 2016(CXTDG2016-02006)

RichHTML

83

PDF (PC)

521

Abstract:

Objective This study was performed to investigate the association and prevalence of ponticulus posticus in patients with maxillary palatally impacted canine by using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods We selected 117 patients with maxillary palatally impacted canine as the experimental group and 147 with normally erupted canine as the control group. CBCT images and Mimics 20.0 software were used to record the morphology of the ponticulus posticus. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 21.0. Results The prevalence rates of ponticulus posticus were 35.04% in the experimental group and 21.09% in the control group. The prevalence between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). No significant difference was found between the prevalence of unilateral and bilateral ponticulus posticus in the two groups (P>0.05). The prevalence of ponticulus posticus in males was significantly higher than that in females in the experimental group (P<0.05). By contrast, the gender difference in the control group was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The prevalence of ponticulus posticus type 1+2 was higher in the experimental group than that in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion The prevalence of ponticulus posticus in patients with maxillary palatally impacted canine was significantly higher than that in patients with normally erupted canine, with higher prevalence rate in males.

Key words: maxillary palatally impacted canine, ponticulus posticus, cone-beam computed tomography

CLC Number: 

  • R78

TrendMD: 

Fig 1

Ponticulus posticus types"

Tab 1

Comparison of ponticulus posticus types between experimental group and control group n(%)"

类型
分组		 实验组 对照组
男性 女性 合计 男性 女性 合计
1+1 22（45.83） 54（78.26） 76（64.96） 43（79.63） 73（78.49） 116（78.91）
2+2 6（12.50） 3（4.35） 9（7.70） 3（5.56） 4（4.30） 7（4.76）
3+3 1（2.08） 0（0） 1（0.85） 0（0） 1（1.08） 1（0.68）
4+4 2（4.16） 0（0） 2（1.71） 2（3.70） 1（1.08） 3（2.04）
1+2* 7（14.58） 4（5.80） 11（9.40） 1（1.85） 6（6.45） 7（4.76）
1+3 4（8.33） 1（1.45） 5（4.27） 2（3.70） 3（3.23） 5（3.40）
1+4 1（2.08） 2（2.90） 3（2.56） 1（1.85） 2（2.15） 3（2.04）
2+3 1（2.08） 2（2.90） 3（2.56） 1（1.85） 1（1.08） 2（1.36）
2+4 4（8.33） 2（2.90） 6（5.13） 1（1.85） 2（2.15） 3（2.04）
3+4 0（0） 1（1.45） 1（0.85） 0（0） 0（0） 0（0）
合计 48 69 117 54 93 147
[1] Bishara SE. Impacted maxillary canines: a review[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1992, 101(2):159-171.
doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(92)70008-X
[2] Becker A, Chaushu S. Etiology of maxillary canine impaction: a review[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2015, 148(4):557-567.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.013
[3] Brin I, Becker A, Shalhav M. Position of the maxillary permanent canine in relation to anomalous or missing lateral incisors: a population study[J]. Eur J Orthod, 1986, 8(1):12-16.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/8.1.12
[4] Peck S, Peck L, Kataja M. The palatally displaced canine as a dental anomaly of genetic origin[J]. Angle Orthod, 1994, 64(4):249-256.
pmid: 7978519
[5] Haji Ghadimi M, Amini F, Hamedi S, et al. Associations among sella Turcica bridging, atlas arcuate foramen (ponticulus posticus) development, atlas posterior arch deficiency, and the occurrence of palatally displaced canine impaction[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2017, 151(3):513-520.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.08.024
[6] Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, et al. Skeletal ano-malies and normal variants in patients with palatally displaced canines[J]. Angle Orthod, 2009, 79(4):727-732.
doi: 10.2319/082408-448.1 pmid: 19537879
[7] Matsuoka T, Ahlberg PE, Kessaris N, et al. Neural crest origins of the neck and shoulder[J]. Nature, 2005, 436(7049):347-355.
doi: 10.1038/nature03837
[8] Miletich I, Sharpe PT. Neural crest contribution to mammalian tooth formation[J]. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today, 2004, 72(2):200-212.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1542-9768
[9] Cederberg RA, Benson BW, Nunn M, et al. Arcuate foramen: prevalence by age, gender, and degree of calcification[J]. Clin Orthod Res, 2000, 3(3):162-167.
doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.30309.x
[10] Tripodi D, Tieri M, Demartis P, et al. Ponticulus posticus: clinical and CBCT analysis in a young Italian population[J]. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 2019, 20(3):219-223.
doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.03.10 pmid: 31489822
[11] Bayrakdar IŞ, Miloğlu Ö, Yeşiltepe S, et al. Ponticulus posticus in a cohort of orthodontic children and adolescent patients with different sagittal skeletal ano-malies: a comparative cone beam computed tomography investigation[J]. Folia Morphol (Warsz), 2018, 77(1):65-71.
[12] 刘安琪, 钱玉芬. 上颌尖牙阻生原因及其对周围结构的影响[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(6):684-688.
Liu AQ, Qian YF. Features and influence of impacted maxillary permanent canine on surrounding structures[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2017, 26(6):684-688.
[13] Elliott RE, Tanweer O. The prevalence of the ponticulus posticus (arcuate foramen) and its importance in the Goel-Harms procedure: Meta-analysis and review of the literature[J]. World Neurosurg, 2014, 82(1/2):e335-e343.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2013.09.014
[14] Morotomi T, Kawano S, Toyono T, et al. In vitro differentiation of dental epithelial progenitor cells th-rough epithelial-mesenchymal interactions[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2005, 50(8):695-705.
doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.12.006
[15] 李璐, 陈智, 张露. 牙型发育的研究进展[J]. 武汉大学学报(医学版), 2008, 29(6):831-833.
Li L, Chen Z, Zhang L. Research advance in dental patterning[J]. Med J Wuhan Univ, 2008, 29(6):831-833.
[16] 陈澜月, 赵阳, 郑博文, 等. 腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙与鞍桥的相关性研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017, 33(3):295-297.
Chen LY, Zhao Y, Zheng BW, et al. Study on the relevance of palatal impacted canine and sella bri-dges[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2017, 33(3):295-297.
[17] 陈澜月, 牛磊, 陈艳娜, 等. 腭侧埋伏阻生尖牙与颈椎骨骼异常的相关性研究[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2017, 26(1):73-75.
Chen LY, Niu L, Chen YN, et al. Cervical skeletal abnormalities in patients with palatally displaced canine[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2017, 26(1):73-75.
[18] Geist JR, Geist SM, Lin LM. A cone beam CT investigation of ponticulus posticus and lateralis in children and adolescents[J]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 2014, 43(5):20130451.
doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130451
[19] Bebnowski D, Hänggi MP, Markic G, et al. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in subjects with ClassⅡmalocclusion assessed by lateral cephalogram and cone beam computed tomography[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2012, 34(2):226-231.
doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq192
[20] 王嘉艺, 王珊, 王林. CBCT在口腔正畸学头影测量中的应用与发展[J]. 口腔医学, 2016, 36(11):1047-1050.
Wang JY, Wang S, Wang L. Application and deve-lopment of CBCT in the orthodontics cephalometrics[J]. Stomatology, 2016, 36(11):1047-1050.
[1] Wu Wenzhi,Feng Da-xing,Chen Chuizhuang,Zhou Lijuan.. Incidence and related factors of middle mesial canals in mandibular first molars in Haikou [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 420-425.
[2] Ding Zhangfan,Guo Zhiyong,Miao Cheng,Li Chunjie,Xuan Ming,Wang Xiaoyi,Zhang Zhuang. Application of the cone-beam computed tomography-based three-dimensional visualization technology in the surgery of the jaw cystic lesion [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2021, 48(2): 180-186.
[3] Zhu Hualing,Yan Yujia,Zou Ling. Research progress on the root canal morphology of maxillary permanent molars by using cone-beam computed tomography [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2020, 47(6): 699-705.
[4] Zhu Chenyou, Deng Jia, Gan Zhoujie, Liu Liu, Wang Tianlu, Cao Cong, Qu Yili. The application of cone-beam computed tomography in implant surgery of maxillary anterior teeth area [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 59-63.
[5] Luo Zhiqiang, Ye Zhongtai. A study of maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness of different population in Xinjiang region using cone-beam CT [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(1): 55-58.
[6] Ren Hongyu, Chen Xin. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with different voxel resolutions and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated apical root resorption [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(5): 514-517.
[7] Luo Houzhuo, Jia Lihui, Li Chengri, Zhang Wenjun, Zhang Xiaodong.. Comparison of general angle magnitudes measured using two kinds of cephalometric measuring software [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(5): 592-594.
[8] Liu Taiqi, Zhou Li, Wang Yanmin.. Current situation and progress of evaluating mesiodistal root angulation by panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomograph [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(1): 102-104.
[9] Xu Ziqing, Feng Jing.. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography in oral maxillofacial linear measurements [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2012, 39(4): 557-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .