Inter J Stomatol ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 320-324.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.03.014
• Reviews • Previous Articles Next Articles
Gai Kuo, Hao Liying, Jiang Li.
CLC Number:
[1] Dufrêne YF. Atomic force microscopy in microbio-logy: new structural and functional insights into the microbial cell surface[J]. MBio, 2014, 5(4):e01314- e01363. [2] Das T, Sharma PK, Krom BP, et al. Role of eDNA on the adhesion forces between Streptococcus mutans and substratum surfaces: influence of ionic strength and substratum hydrophobicity[J]. Langmuir, 2011, 27(16):10113-10118. [3] Dorobantu LS, Gray MR. Application of atomic force microscopy in bacterial research[J]. Scanning, 2010, 32(2):74-96. [4] Louise Meyer R, Zhou X, Tang L, et al. Immobilisa-tion of living bacteria for AFM imaging under phy-siological conditions[J]. Ultramicroscopy, 2010, 110 (11):1349-1357. [5] Lonergan NE, Britt LD, Sullivan CJ. Immobilizing live Escherichia coli for AFM studies of surface dynamics[J]. Ultramicroscopy, 2014, 137:30-39. [6] Kang S, Elimelech M. Bioinspired single bacterial cell force spectroscopy[J]. Langmuir, 2009, 25(17): 9656-9659. [7] Stukalov O, Korenevsky A, Beveridge TJ, et al. Use of atomic force microscopy and transmission elec-tron microscopy for correlative studies of bacterial capsules[J]. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2008, 74(17): 5457-5465. [8] Suo Z, Yang X, Deliorman M, et al. Capture eff-iciency of Escherichia coli in fimbriae-mediated immunoimmobilization[J]. Langmuir, 2012, 28(2): 1351-1359. [9] Potthoff E, Ossola D, Zambelli T, et al. Bacterial adhesion force quantification by fluidic force micro-scopy[J]. Nanoscale, 2015, 7(9):4070-4079. [10] Cross SE, Kreth J, Zhu L, et al. Atomic force mic-roscopy study of the structure-function relationships of the biofilm-forming bacterium Streptococcus mutans [J]. Nanotechnology, 2006, 17(4):S1-S7. [11] Busscher HJ, Van De Belt-Gritter B, Dijkstra RJ, et al. Intermolecular forces and enthalpies in the ad-hesion of Streptococcus mutans and an antigen Ⅰ/Ⅱ- deficient mutant to laminin films[J]. J Bacteriol, 2007, 189(8):2988-2995. [12] Mei L, Van Der Mei HC, Ren Y, et al. Poisson ana-lysis of streptococcal bond strengthening on stainless steel with and without a salivary conditioning film [J]. Langmuir, 2009, 25(11):6227-6231. [13] Mei L, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC, et al. Oral bacterial adhesion forces to biomaterial surfaces constituting the bracket-adhesive-enamel junction in orthodontic treatment[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2009, 117 (4):419-426. [14] Zheng P, Cao Y, Bu T, et al. Single molecule force spectroscopy reveals that electrostatic interactions affect the mechanical stability of proteins[J]. Bio-phys J, 2011, 100(6):1534-1541. [15] Larson MR, Rajashankar KR, Crowley PJ, et al. Crystal structure of the C-terminal region of Strep-tococcus mutans antigen Ⅰ/Ⅱ and characterization of salivary agglutinin adherence domains[J]. J Biol Chem, 2011, 286(24):21657-21666. [16] Guo L, Wu T, Hu W, et al. Phenotypic characteriza-tion of the foldase homologue PrsA in Streptococcus mutans [J]. Mol Oral Microbiol, 2013, 28(2):154- 165. [17] Matsumoto-Nakano M, Nagayama K, Kitagori H, et al. Inhibitory effects of Oenothera biennis(evening primrose) seed extract on Streptococcus mutans and S. mutans -induced dental caries in rats[J]. Caries Res, 2011, 45(1):56-63. [18] Sullan RM, Li JK, Crowley PJ, et al. Binding forces of Streptococcus mutans P1 adhesin[J]. ACS Nano, 2015, 9(2):1448-1460. [19] Klein MI, Hwang G, Santos PH, et al. Streptococcus mutans -derived extracellular matrix in cariogenic oral biofilms[J]. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2015, 5:10. [20] Heim KP, Crowley PJ, Long JR, et al. An intramo-lecular lock facilitates folding and stabilizes the tertiary structure of Streptococcus mutans adhesin P1[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2014, 111(44): 15746-15751. [21] Bowen WH, Koo H. Biology of Streptococcus mutans -derived glucosyltransferases: role in extrace-llular matrix formation of cariogenic biofilms[J]. Caries Res, 2011, 45(1):69-86. [22] Wang C, Zhao Y, Zheng S, et al. Effect of enamel morphology on nanoscale adhesion forces of strep-tococcal bacteria: an AFM study[J]. Scanning, 2015, 37(5):313-321. [23] Verran J, Jackson S, Coulthwaite L, et al. The effect of dentifrice abrasion on denture topography and the subsequent retention of microorganisms on abraded surfaces[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2014, 112(6):1513- 1522. [24] Mei L, Busscher HJ, Van Der Mei HC, et al. In-fluence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhe-sion forces to composite resins[J]. Dent Mater, 2011, 27(8):770-778. [25] Pita PP, Rodrigues JA, Ota-Tsuzuki C, et al. Oral Streptococci biofilm formation on different implant surface topographies[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2015, 2015:159625. [26] Hsiao SW, Venault A, Yang HS, et al. Bacterial resistance of self-assembled surfaces using PPOm-b-PSBMAn zwitterionic copolymer-concomitant effects of surface topography and surface chemistry on attachment of live bacteria[J]. Colloids Surf B Bioin-terfaces, 2014, 118:254-260. [27] Ionescu A, Brambilla E, Wastl DS, et al. Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites [J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2015, 26(1):5372. [28] Loskill P, Zeitz C, Grandthyll S, et al. Reduced adhesion of oral bacteria on hydroxyapatite by fluo-ride treatment[J]. Langmuir, 2013, 29(18):5528- 5533. |
[1] | Gong Tao,Li Yuqing,Zhou Xuedong.. Research progress on sugar transporter and regulatory mechanisms in Streptococcus mutans [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(5): 506-510. |
[2] | Li Shanshan,Yang Fang. Research progress on the relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans in caries [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(4): 392-396. |
[3] | Wang Rui,Gai Kuo,Liu Mengqi,Jiang Li. Role of atomic force microscopy in research on microbial adhesion force [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2019, 46(6): 687-692. |
[4] | Xu Feng,Yi Zhang,Menghong Li,Nan Liu,Liuyi Wang,Min. Hu. Research progress on the influence of removable clear aligners on periodontal health [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(2): 166-170. |
[5] | Mengqi Liu,Kuo Gai,Li Jiang. Research progress on oral implant materials with antimicrobial properties [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(5): 516-521. |
[6] | Jing Wang,Yan Wang,Chuandong Wang,Ruijie Huang,Yan Tian,Wei Hu,Jing Zou. Application of liquorice and its extract to the prevention and treatment of oral infections and associated diseases [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(5): 546-552. |
[7] | Liu Shiyu, He Jinzhi, Li Mingyun.. Saccharomyces albicans: its dental caries correlation and mechanism [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(1): 103-107. |
[8] | Liu Kun, Hou Benxiang.. Biological activity of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans lipoteichoic acid [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(1): 118-124. |
[9] | Zhang Ying, Li Mingyong, Huo Li, Meng Yuan. Biosynthesis of autoinducer-2 and determination of its bioactivity in vitro [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(5): 519-523. |
[10] | Zhao Xingfu, Jiang Shan, Huang Xiaojing, Yan Fuhua. Differential expression of surface-associated proteins in clinical isolations of Streptococcus mutans [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(3): 273-277. |
[11] | Wang Yizhou, Zhang Yaqi, Niu Xuewei, Zhang Zhimin. The groE operon of Streptococcus mutans with its expression and regulation [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(3): 348-351. |
[12] | Shi Jing, Yan Zhengbin, Hou Jingqiu, Peng Hui. Influence of bracketless invisible aligner technique and conventional technique on the number of Streptococcus mutans and Porphyromonas gingivalis [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2016, 43(2): 151-154. |
[13] | Liu Yi1, Fei Wei1, Wang Lina2, Zhang Siyu3, Wang Yanjun1, Wu Hongkun4.. Effects of synthetic antimicrobial decapeptide on the growth and structure of Streptococcus mutans biofilm [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(4): 401-405. |
[14] | Song Ying, Zou Ling.. Structure, function, and control strategies of collagen and laminin-binding protein [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(4): 466-470. |
[15] | Zhang Jianying, Ling Junqi. Function of surface protein antigen P in the biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(1): 111-113. |