Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2016, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6): 632-635.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2016.06.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of geriatric oral health assessment index and oral health impact profile-14 as measures of oral healthrelated quality of life of middle-aged and elderly individuals in southwest China

Deng Yuejia, Wang Chenbing, Zhang Ximu, Yue Zhaoguo, Liu Yunkun, Jin Zhenning, Zhao Man.   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. Dept. of Pharmacy, 324 Hospital of People Liberation Army, Chongqing 400020, China
  • Online:2016-11-01 Published:2016-11-01

RichHTML

11

PDF (PC)

511

Abstract: Objective This study compares oral health-related quality of life among middle-aged and elderly individuals in southwest China by geriatric oral health assessment index(GOHAI) and oral health impact profile-14(OHIP-14) scales, to test the reliability of GOHAI and OHIP-14 scales, and to select the more effective scale in evaluating oral health-related quality of life of rural middle-aged and elderly individuals. Methods Surveys with OHIP-14 and GOHAI scales were conducted face-to-face among rural middle-aged and elderly individuals above 45 years old from Qingchuan Sichuan and Xishui Guizhou randomly. Differences between the two scales were compared by Paired sample t-test(P=0.05). Reliability was evaluated by Cronbach’s alpha. Results GOHAI and OHIP-14 scales were highly consistent in assessing oral health-related quality of life in the same subject. GOHAI and OHIP-14 scores of middle-aged and elderly people showed differences in each dimension except for the psychological dimension. Reliability analysis showed that OHIP-14 is inherently more stable and reliable. Conlusion OHIP-14 scale is more suitable for the evaluation of oral health quality of life among middle-aged and elderly individuals in rural southwest China.

Key words: middle-aged and elderly individuals, oral health-related quality of life, scale, rural population


TrendMD: 
[1] Tang Xiaojuan, Liu Xiaojing, Sun Yongheng, Zhang Jingxia. Efficacy of narrow-spectrum intense pulsed light in the treatment of scar after surgery of primary unilateral cleft lip [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2023, 50(4): 433-437.
[2] Xia Feifei,Qin Wenjuan,Feng Jia,Zhou Xuyang,Sun Ercan,Li Changxue. Value research on differential diagnosis of pleomorphic adenomas and adenolymphoma by histogram analysis of ultrasound gray [J]. Int J Stomatol, 2022, 49(1): 60-65.
[3] Chen Qingya, Huang Qian, Wang Li. Assessment of dental anxiety in patients undergoing surgical procedures for tooth implants [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2018, 45(1): 14-19.
[4] Sun Qiuhua, Xiao Danna, Gao Hui, Dou Zesheng. Correlation between malocclusion and oral health-related life quality in university students [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2015, 42(2): 156-159.
[5] Zhuang Xiumei, Deng Feilong.. Effect and mechanism of titanium with nanoscale surface modification for osseointegration [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2014, 41(4): 427-430.
[6] Liu Lijun, Jiang. Evaluation and research advance on quality of life in patients with oral diseases [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2011, 38(4): 467-469.
[7] CHEN Mu, WANG Da-wei, FENG Zhi-cai. Application of survey on oral health-related quality of life in orthodontic field [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(4): 488-491.
[8] GONG Yi-ming, DING Xiao-jun, REN Ying. Clinical evaluation of dentine sensitivity after scaling and root planing [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2009, 36(3): 256-259.
[9] WANG Zhenglun, FANG Wen-jing, ZHONG Qiu, TONG Qing-hua, HU Ling-jie, SHAO Zhuo-na, SU Shan-shan, YANG Ming-yan. A clinical research on upper mandible tooth extraction without anesthetizing pala [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(6): 624-624～626.
[10] SUN Wei- bin1, CHEN Zhiqing2. Novel approach for cell cultur e in tissue engineer ing: Microscale technologies< [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(3): 314-314～317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .