Int J Stomatol

Inter J Stomatol ›› 2012, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 16-19.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5749.2012.01.005

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shear bond strengths of different types of adhesive resin agents to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic

Zhong Qun, Shen Qingyi, Wu Xueying, Li Guoqiang.   

  1. Dept. of Prosthodontics, Shanghai Stomotological Disease Center, Shanghai 200031, China
  • Received:2010-08-16 Revised:2011-09-23 Online:2012-01-01 Published:2012-01-01

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

876

Abstract:

Objective To observe and compare the shear bond strength of different composite resin cement systems to glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic. Methods 40 healthy non-carious human molars were selected in the study. The samples were divided into four groups, 10 pieces for each group, including group A（Solobond Plus+Bifix QM）, group B（Futurabond DC+Bifix QM）, group C（Bifix SE）, and group D（Panavia F）. All specimens were stored in water at 37 °C for 24 hours. The shear bond strength of four different bonding systems to dentin was tested respectively. The data were statistically analyzed by ANOVA with SAS 6.12. Results Shear bond strength of Panavia F was significantly higher than that of other three groups（P<0.01）, and the shear bond strength of Bifix SE was much lower than other groups. Conclusion A successful bond can be achieved by Panavia F in glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic.

Key words: shear bond strength, adhesive resin agent, glass infiltrated alumina oxide ceramic


TrendMD: 
[1] Ding Hong, Chen Jifen, Wu Jianyong. Influence of different adhesive materials on the shear bond strength of metal brackets to porcelain surface [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2017, 44(4): 430-432.
[2] Lin Yihua1, Song Xiaomeng2, Zhang Wei3. Study of bonding property among 3 kinds of resin-reinforced glass ionomer and zirconia ceramics [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2013, 40(3): 305-308.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] . [J]. Foreign Med Sci: Stomatol, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] . [J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2008, 35(S1): .