国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 329-328.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021031

• 综述 • 上一篇    下一篇

超短种植体临床应用效果的影响因素

路泊遥(),杨大维,刘蔚晴,梁星()   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心 四川大学华西口腔医院修复Ⅱ科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-10 修回日期:2020-11-13 出版日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2021-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 梁星
  • 作者简介:路泊遥,硕士,Email: jnlby11@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81900967)

Influencing factors of the clinical application effect of ultrashort implant

Lu Boyao(),Yang Dawei,Liu Weiqing,Liang Xing()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Prosthodontics Ⅱ, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2020-08-10 Revised:2020-11-13 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-14
  • Contact: Xing Liang
  • Supported by:
    National Natural Science Foundation of China(81900967)

摘要:

在口腔种植治疗过程中,往往会因为患者牙槽骨吸收,导致剩余垂直骨量不足,影响种植体植入。为解决这一问题,近年来,越来越多的短种植体及超短种植体用于临床。但是,种植体的长度、直径、表面形态与处理,以及患者的骨状况、种植位点,修复体方案设计等因素,都会影响到超短种植体的实际应用,因此其临床效果也不一定都令人满意。通过对超短种植体使用效果影响因素的研究,可以有效提升其存留率,减少并发症的发生,实现更完美的种植治疗。本文就超短种植体的临床应用效果相关影响因素作一综述。

关键词: 超短种植体, 临床效果, 种植体设计, 种植修复

Abstract:

During implant restoration, the clinician often faces insufficient residual alveolar bone for implant due to severe resorption, which adversely affects implant implantation. In recent years, more short and ultrashort implants are used in the clinic to solve this problem. However, the length, diameter, surface morphology, and treatment of implants as well as the patient’s bone condition, implant site, and prosthesis design influence the practical application of ultrashort implants. Thus, the clinical effect is not always satisfactory. Studying the factors influencing the clinical effect of ultrashort implants can effectively improve the survival rate, reduce the occurrence of complications, and achieve a more perfect implant treatment. This study reviews the factors related to the clinical application effect of ultrashort implants.

Key words: ultrashort implant, clinical effect, implant design, implant ?restoration

中图分类号: 

  • R783.2
[1] Slotte C, Grønningsaeter A, Halmøy AM, et al. Four-millimeter-long posterior-mandible implants: 5-year outcomes of a prospective multicenter study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2015,17(Suppl 2):e385-e395.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12252
[2] Mezzomo LA, Miller R, Triches D, et al. Meta-analysis of single crowns supported by short (10 mm) implants in the posterior region[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2014,41(2):191-213.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12180
[3] Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, et al. EAO Supplement Working Group 4-EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(Suppl 11):154-169.
[4] Jung RE, Al-Nawas B, Araujo M, et al. Group 1 ITI consensus report: the influence of implant length and design and medications on clinical and patient-reported outcomes[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 16):69-77.
[5] Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, et al. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012,27(6):1429-1437
pmid: 23189293
[6] Nisand D, Renouard F. Short implant in limited bone volume[J]. Periodontol 2000, 2014,66(1):72-96.
doi: 10.1111/prd.2014.66.issue-1
[7] Lombardo G, Marincola M, Signoriello A, et al. Single-crown, short and ultra-short implants, in association with simultaneous internal sinus lift in the atrophic posterior maxilla: a three-year retrospective study[J]. Materials(Basel), 2020,13(9):E2208.
[8] Malchiodi L, Caricasulo R, Cucchi A, et al. Evaluation of ultrashort and longer implants with microrough surfaces: results of a 24- to 36-month prospective study[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(1):171-179.
doi: 10.11607/jomi.4648 pmid: 28095521
[9] Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, et al. Survival rates of short dental implants (≤6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: a Meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 16):8-20.
[10] Xu XX, Hu B, Xu Y, et al. Short versus standard implants for single-crown restorations in the posterior region: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2020,124(5):530-538.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.09.030
[11] Vazouras K, de Souza AB, Gholami H, et al. Effect of time in function on the predictability of short dental implants (≤6 mm): a Meta-analysis[J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2020,47(3):403-415.
doi: 10.1111/joor.v47.3
[12] Rameh S, Menhall A, Younes R. Key factors influencing short implant success[J]. Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2020,24(3):263-275.
doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00841-y
[13] Ravidà A, Wang IC, Barootchi S, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical and patient-reported outcomes between extra-short (≤6 mm) and longer (≥10 mm) implants[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2019,46(1):118-142.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2019.46.issue-1
[14] Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2012,14(4):622-632.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2012.14.issue-4
[15] Lombardo G, Pighi J, Marincola M, et al. Cumulative success rate of short and ultrashort implants supporting single crowns in the posterior maxilla: a 3-year retrospective study[J]. Int J Dent, 2017,2017:8434281.
doi: 10.1155/2017/8434281 pmid: 28751913
[16] Araki H, Nakano T, Ono S, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of extra short implants focusing on implant designs and materials[J]. Int J Implant Dent, 2020,6(1):5.
doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0202-6
[17] Markose J, Eshwar S, Srinivas S, et al. Clinical outcomes of ultrashort sloping shoulder implant design: a survival analysis[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2018,20(4):646-652.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12608 pmid: 29671933
[18] Mijiritsky E, Mazor Z, Lorean A, et al. Implant diameter and length influence on survival: interim results during the first 2 years of function of implants by a single manufacturer[J]. Implant Dent, 2013,22(4):394-398.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31829afac0 pmid: 23811719
[19] Hasanoglu Erbasar GN, Hocaoğlu TP, Erbasar RC. Risk factors associated with short dental implant success: a long-term retrospective evaluation of patients followed up for up to 9 years[J]. Braz Oral Res, 2019,33:e030.
doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0030
[20] Calvo-Guirado JL, Morales-Meléndez H, Pérez-Albacete Martínez C, et al. Evaluation of the surrounding ring of two different extra-short implant designs in crestal bone maintanence: a histologic study in dogs[J]. Materials(Basel), 2018,11(9):E1630.
[21] Lopez Torres JA, Gehrke SA, Calvo Guirado JL, et al. Evaluation of four designs of short implants placed in atrophic areas with reduced bone height: a three-year, retrospective, clinical and radiographic study[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,55(7):703-708.
doi: S0266-4356(17)30183-3 pmid: 28629832
[22] Guljé FL, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, et al. Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: a five-year prospective case series[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2019,21(5):1017-1022.
doi: 10.1111/cid.v21.5
[23] Jain N, Gulati M, Garg M, et al. Short implants: new horizon in implant dentistry[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016,10(9):ZE14-ZE17.
[24] Amine M, Guelzim Y, Benfaida S, et al. Short implants (5-8 mm) vs. long implants in augmented bone and their impact on peri-implant bone in maxilla and/or mandible: systematic review[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019,120(2):133-142.
doi: S2468-7855(18)30259-3 pmid: 30472460
[25] Piccinini M, Cugnoni J, Botsis J, et al. Numerical prediction of peri-implant bone adaptation: comparison of mechanical stimuli and sensitivity to modeling parameters[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2016,38(11):1348-1359.
doi: S1350-4533(16)30185-0 pmid: 27641659
[26] Malchiodi L, Giacomazzi E, Cucchi A, et al. Relationship between crestal bone levels and crown-to-implant ratio of ultra-short implants with a microrough surface: a prospective study with 48 months of follow-up[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2019,45(1):18-28.
doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-17-00204 pmid: 30040018
[27] Meijer HJA, Boven C, Delli K, et al. Is there an effect of crown-to-implant ratio on implant treatment outcomes? A systematic review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018,29(Suppl 18):243-252.
[28] Malchiodi L, Ricciardi G, Salandini A, et al. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rate of ultra-short dental implants: results of a 8- to 10-year retrospective study[J]. Clin Oral Investig, 2020,24(9):3213-3222.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03195-7 pmid: 32681422
[29] Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, et al. Influence of crown-implant ratio on implant success rates and crestal bone levels: a 36-month follow-up prospective study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2014,25(2):240-251.
doi: 10.1111/clr.12105 pmid: 23402530
[30] Garaicoa-Pazmiño C, Suárez-López del Amo F, Monje A, et al. Influence of crown/implant ratio on marginal bone loss: a systematic review[J]. J Periodontol, 2014,85(9):1214-1221.
doi: 10.1902/jop.2014.130615
[31] Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, et al. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2005,20(1):69-76.
doi: 10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80708-8
[32] Elias DM, Valerio CS, de Oliveira DD, et al. Evaluation of different heights of prosthetic crowns supported by an ultra-short implant using three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2020,33(1):81-90.
doi: 10.11607/ijp.6247
[33] Toniollo MB, Macedo AP, Pupim D, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis surface stress distribution on regular and short morse taper implants generated by splinted and nonsplinted prostheses in the rehabilitation of various bony ridges[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016,27(3):e276-e280.
doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002520
[34] Ravidà A, Barootchi S, Askar H, et al. Long-term effectiveness of extra-short (≤ 6 mm) dental implants: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2019,34(1):68-84.
[35] Meimandi M, Talebi Ardakani MR, Amid R, et al. Comparison of stress and strain distribution around splinted and nonsplinted 6-mm short implants in posterior mandible: a finite element analysis study[J]. Implant Dent, 2018,27(1):74-80.
doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000709 pmid: 29334509
[36] Tang YM, Yu HJ, Wang J, et al. Influence of crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic designs on the clinical conditions of short implants in posterior regions: a 4-year retrospective clinical and radiographic study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2020,22(1):119-127.
doi: 10.1111/cid.2020.v22.1
[37] Hingsammer L, Watzek G, Pommer B. The influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone levels around splinted short dental implants: a radiological and clincial short term analysis[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(6):1090-1098.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12546 pmid: 29024303
[38] Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, et al. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: a Meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. J Clin Periodontol, 2011,38(9):856-863.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.2011.38.issue-9
[39] Simons WF, De Smit M, Duyck J, et al. The proportion of cancellous bone as predictive factor for early marginal bone loss around implants in the posterior part of the mandible[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015,26(9):1051-1059.
doi: 10.1111/clr.2015.26.issue-9
[40] Villarinho EA, Triches DF, Alonso FR, et al. Risk factors for single crowns supported by short (6-mm) implants in the posterior region: a prospective clinical and radiographic study[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2017,19(4):671-680.
doi: 10.1111/cid.12494 pmid: 28493384
[41] Lemos CA, Ferro-Alves ML, Okamoto R, et al. Short dental implants versus standard dental implants placed in the posterior jaws: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. J Dent, 2016,47:8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.01.005
[1] 汤春波. 无牙颌患者种植治疗修复空间与修复方式的选择策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 1-9.
[2] 雒琪玥,柳叶语,罗依麟,满毅. 以正中关系为中心、面部美学及修复为导向的数字化无牙颌种植修复1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 426-431.
[3] 冯璐,孟文霞. 常见口腔黏膜疾病患者行种植修复相关问题的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 147-155.
[4] 黄海霞, 兰玉燕, 张昊, 潘兰兰, 郭玲, 刘敏. 慢性牙周炎患者种植修复后种植体牙周指数及龈沟液炎性因子水平的变化研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(4): 396-402.
[5] 孟玉坤, 宗弋. 瓷贴面修复的研究现状及临床应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(1): 1-10.
[6] 赵倩,刘岩. 2种非金属桩核修复上前牙残冠临床效果的比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2016, 43(4): 383-386.
[7] 刘晶莹综述 刘晓明审校. 不同牙体预备对瓷贴面力学性能和临床修复效果的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(3): 404-407.
[8] 梁毅夫. 间接或直接树脂修复无髓磨牙的临床疗效观察[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(3): 301-304.
[9] 罗颖, 丁一, 王萌, 杨恒, 朱硃. 西帕依固龈液的抑菌作用和防治牙龈炎的临床效果评价[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(4): 394-397.
[10] 郭玉峰1,梅玉新2. 卓美流动聚合体和光固化窝沟封闭剂3 年临床效果评估[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(1): 27-27~29.
[11] 郭雪松,田雨. 华西法单侧唇裂修复术式的应用体会[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(1): 4-4~5.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .