国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 297-304.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2021053

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

热处理连续旋转镍钛锉对重度弯曲根管成形能力的比较研究

王宏媛1(),何露1,张茹1,郑德强2,李红1()   

  1. 1.首都医科大学附属北京口腔医院牙体牙髓科 北京 100050
    2.首都医科大学公共卫生学院 北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-15 修回日期:2020-12-29 出版日期:2021-05-01 发布日期:2021-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 李红
  • 作者简介:王宏媛,硕士,Email： 949151831@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学科研培育基金(PYZ19076)

Comparative study on the shaping ability of thermally treated continuous rotating nickel-titanium systems for severely curved simulated canals

Wang Hongyuan1(),He Lu1,Zhang Ru1,Zheng Deqiang2,Li Hong1()   

  1. 1. Dept. of Endodontics, Beijing Stomatological Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2020-09-15 Revised:2020-12-29 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-05-14
  • Contact: Hong Li
  • Supported by:
    Research and Cultivation Fund of Capital Medical University(PYZ19076)

RichHTML

78

PDF (PC)

1158

摘要：

目的 比较3种不同热处理连续旋转机用镍钛锉与传统镍钛锉预备重度弯曲根管的成形能力,为其临床应用提供实验依据。方法 将60个重度弯曲（45°）树脂模拟根管随机分为4组,每组15个,分别使用Twisted File锉（R-相技术,TF组）、ProTaper Next锉（M-wire技术,PTN组）、Hyflex CM锉（CM-wire技术,HCM组）以及Mtwo锉（传统技术,Mtwo组）进行根管预备,并记录预备时间,测量4个实验组预备前后根管工作长度的变化,采用失重法比较树脂切削量,数码相机采集预备前后根管的形态,使用Photoshop软件将其重叠,通过ImageJ软件测量根管树脂去除量,计算中心定位能力。使用单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis检验及Bonferroni检验进行统计学分析。结果 4种器械预备前后根管工作长度变化的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。Mtwo组预备后树脂切削量最多（P<0.05）,其余3组之间树脂切削量的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。在距根尖孔0 mm及7~9 mm的观测位点,4组器械的中心定位能力无明显差异（P>0.05）;在距根尖孔1~2 mm的观测位点（即根方弯曲部分）,TF组的中心定位能力较其他3组更好,Mtwo组的偏移量在根方弯曲部分及弯曲最凸点冠方均为最大（P<0.05）。TF组的根管预备时间最短,PTN组次之,与其他2组的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 4组器械均可快速有效地预备弯曲根管,且可较好地保持重度弯曲根管的原始形态;与传统镍钛锉相比,3种热处理镍钛锉均具有更好的中心定位能力,其中Twisted File锉在根尖区的中心定位能力最好。

关键词: 成形能力, 弯曲根管, 根管偏移, 热处理, 连续旋转镍钛锉

Abstract:

Objective This study aimed to compare the centring ability of three different thermally treated continuous rotating systems in severely curved simulated canals. Methods Sixty single-curved canals in resin blocks were prepared by using the Twisted File (group TF, R-phase),ProTaper Next (group PTN, M-wire), Hyflex CM (group HCM, CM-wire), and Mtwo (group Mtwo, traditional nickel-titanium alloy) systems (n=15), and the preparation time was recorded. The reduction in the working length after the preparation was measured. The weight change in the resin block was measured using an electronic balance. Images of pre- and post-instrumentation were recorded by digital camera and then superimposed by Photoshop. The amount of resin removed was measured by ImageJ. The differences between the groups were determined using one-way ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis and post hoc Bonferroni tests. Results No significant difference was observed in the changes in working length in the four groups (P>0.05). The weight change in the resin block was highest in the group Mtwo (P<0.05), and those of the three other groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). No significant difference was observed in the transportation of the canal at the apical foramen and in the coronal plane portion among four nickel-titanium instruments (P>0.05). In the apical part of the curvature, the group TF had the least root canal transportation (P<0.05), and the group Mtwo had higher root canal transportation than the three other groups in each measurement point (P<0.05). The Twisted File and the ProTaper Next could complete the preparation in a shorter time than the Mtwo and the Hyflex CM (P<0.05). Conclusion All tested files could prepare and maintain the original shape of severely curved canals effectively. This study showed that the Twisted file, ProTaper Next, and Hyflex CM systems had better centring ability than the Mtwo system and that the Twisted file system was demonstrated to have superior shaping ability compared with the others in the apical part.

Key words: shaping ability, curved canal, transportation, thermal treatment, continuous rotating nickel-titanium system

中图分类号: 

  • R781.05

图1

树脂模拟根管拍摄固定装置示意图 上：俯视图;下：正视图。"

图2

树脂模拟根管于定制拍摄模具上的拍摄图像及根管弯曲度示意图 左：置于特制固定实验模具上的树脂模拟根管和测量尺;右：根管弯曲度示意图。"

表1

4种镍钛器械的预备程序"

组别 镍钛锉 马达（生产商） 预备程序 转速/（r·min-1） 扭矩/（N·cm）
TF Twisted File Sybron Endo（Sybron Endo公司,美国） （25#/0.04）→（25#/0.06） 500 1.5
HCM Hyflex CM VDW Silver （VDW公司,德国） （20#/0.04）→（20#/0.06）→
（25#/0.04）→（25#/0.06）		 500 2.5
PTN ProTaper Next X-Smart（Dentsply Maillefer公司,瑞士） （17#/0.04）→（25#/0.06） 300 2.0
Mtwo Mtwo VDW Silver （VDW公司,德国） （10#/0.04）→（15#/0.05）→
（20#/0.06）→（25#/0.06）		 280 1.2（10#/0.04）;1.3（15#/0.05）;
2.1（20#/0.06）;2.3（25#/0.06）

表 2

4种镍钛器械根管预备后工作长度变化值及树脂切削量"

组别 工作长度变化值/mm 树脂切削量/mg
TF 0.249±0.181 0.039 3±0.081 9
HCM 0.249±0.112 0.078 6±0.052 2
PTN 0.227±0.137 0.065 0±0.053 7
Mtwo 0.218±0.158 0.275 0±0.069 3

图3

4种镍钛器械预备树脂模拟弯曲根管前及预备后的重叠影像图 A：TF组;B：HCM组;C：PTN组;D：Mtwo组。黑色为预备前根管图像;红色为预备后根管图像。"

图4

4种镍钛器械在不同观测位点的根管预备偏移量及偏移方向"

[1] Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal[J]. Dent Clin N Am, 1974,18(2):269-296.
[2] Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 1971,32(2):271-275.
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
[3] Weine FS, Kelly RF, Lio PJ. The effect of preparation procedures on original canal shape and on apical foramen shape[J]. J Endod, 1975,1(8):255-262.
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(75)80037-9
[4] Reddy PJ, Kumar VS, Aravind K, et al. Canal sha-ping with one shape file and twisted files: a comparative study[J]. J Clin Diagn Res, 2014,8(12):ZF01-ZF03.
[5] Babu A, Rejula F, Christalin R, et al. Measure and compare the degree of root canal transportation and canal-centering ability of twisted, ProTaper, and conventional stainless steel K files using spiral compu-ted tomography: an in vitro study[J]. J Contemp Dent Pract, 2017,18(6):463-469.
pmid: 28621275
[6] Zuolo ML, Zaia AA, Belladonna FG, et al. Micro-CT assessment of the shaping ability of four root canal instrumentation systems in oval-shaped canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2018,51(5):564-571.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12810 pmid: 28667674
[7] Versiani MA, Carvalho KKT, Mazzi-Chaves JF, et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of XP-endo shaper, iRaCe, and EdgeFile systems in long oval-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2018,44(3):489-495.
doi: S0099-2399(17)31086-5 pmid: 29273492
[8] Gu Y, Kum KY, Perinpanayagam H, et al. Various heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments eva-luated in S-shaped simulated resin canals[J]. J Dent Sci, 2017,12(1):14-20.
doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2016.04.006
[9] Gergi R, Osta N, Bourbouze G, et al. Effects of three nickel titanium instrument systems on root canal geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(2):162-170.
doi: 10.1111/iej.2014.48.issue-2
[10] Silva EJNL, Pacheco PT, Pires F, et al. Microcomputed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation and centring ability of ProTaper Next and Twisted File Adaptive systems[J]. Int Endod J, 2017,50(7):694-699.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12667 pmid: 27256247
[11] Ayar LR, Love RM. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2004,37(9):593-601.
pmid: 15317562
[12] Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper next instruments with and without glide path[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(12):2053-2056.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.09.001 pmid: 25301350
[13] Saleh AM, Vakili Gilani P, Tavanafar S, et al. Sha-ping ability of 4 different single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2015,41(4):548-552.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.11.019
[14] Çelik G, Özdemir Kısacık F, Yılmaz EF, et al. A comparative study of root canal shaping using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary files in preclinical dental education[J]. Peer J, 2019,7:e7419.
doi: 10.7717/peerj.7419
[15] Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means[J]. Endod Top, 2005,10(1):30-76.
doi: 10.1111/etp.2005.10.issue-1
[16] Bürklein S, Stüber JP, Schäfer E. Real-time dyna-mic torque values and axial forces during preparation of straight root canals using three different endodontic motors and hand preparation[J]. Int Endod J, 2019,52(1):94-104.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12980 pmid: 29969837
[17] Muñoz E, Forner L, Llena C. Influence of operator’s experience on root canal shaping ability with a rotary nickel-titanium single-file reciprocating motion system[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(4):547-550.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.027
[18] Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Uslu G. Shaping ability of reciproc, WaveOne GOLD, and HyFlex EDM single-file systems in simulated S-shaped canals[J]. J Endod, 2017,43(5):805-809.
doi: S0099-2399(16)31056-1 pmid: 28292599
[19] Goldberg M, Dahan S, Machtou P. Centering ability and influence of experience when using WaveOne single-file technique in simulated canals[J]. Int J Dent, 2012,2012:1-7.
[20] 侯惠敏, 魏伦全, 韩宇, 等. 三种镍钛锉对弯曲根管成形效果的评价[J]. 中华老年口腔医学杂志, 2018,16(3):137-141.
Hou HM, Wei LQ, Han Y, et al. Evaluation of three nickel-titanium files for forming curved root canal[J]. Chin J Geriatr Dent, 2018,16(3):137-141.
[21] Capar ID, Ertas H, Ok E, et al. Comparison of single cone obturation performance of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems[J]. Acta Odontol S-cand, 2014,72(7):537-542.
[22] van der Vyver PJ, Paleker F, Vorster M, et al. Root canal shaping using nickel titanium, M-wire, and gold wire: a micro-computed tomographic comparative study of one shape, ProTaper next, and Wave-One gold instruments in maxillary first molars[J]. J Endod, 2019,45(1):62-67.
doi: S0099-2399(18)30657-5 pmid: 30446405
[23] Kumar BS, Pattanshetty S, Prasad M, et al. An in-vitro evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of two rotary Nickel Titanium systems (Twis-ted Files and Hyflex files) with conventional stainless Steel hand K-flexofiles by using spiral compu-ted tomography[J]. J Int Oral Health, 2013,5(5):108-115.
[24] Marceliano-Alves MF, Sousa-Neto MD, Fidel SR, et al. Shaping ability of single-file reciprocating and heat-treated multifile rotary systems: a micro-CT stu-dy[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(12):1129-1136.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12412 pmid: 25400256
[25] 仇宁, 王楚瑜, 刘宇飞, 等. 3种机用镍钛器械预备模拟弯曲根管的成形能力比较[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2016,25(2):191-194.
Qiu N, Wang CY, Liu YF, et al. Comparison of the shaping ability of three Ni-Ti rotary instruments in the preparation of simulated curved root canals[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2016,25(2):191-194.
[26] Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE. Assessment of the mecha-nical properties of ProTaper next nickel-titanium rotary files[J]. J Endod, 2014,40(11):1830-1834.
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.06.011 pmid: 25129026
[27] Saber SEDM, Nagy MM, Schäfer E. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2015,48(2):131-136.
doi: 10.1111/iej.12291 pmid: 24697590
[28] 杨殷杰, 侯本祥, 侯晓玫. R-相热处理镍钛根管锉的力学性能和根管预备成形能力[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017,44(2):189-194.
Yang YJ, Hou BX, Hou XM. Mechanical properties and shaping ability of R-phase heat treatment nickel-titanium instruments[J]. Int J Stomatol, 2017,44(2):189-194.
[29] Kim HC, Kim HJ, Lee CJ, et al. Mechanical response of nickel-titanium instruments with different cross-sectional designs during shaping of simulated curved canals[J]. Int Endod J, 2009,42(7):593-602.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01553.x pmid: 19467053
[30] 于小青, 刘宇飞, 郭世博, 等. 5种机用镍钛锉预备根管成形能力的比较研究[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2017,33(3):286-289.
Yu XQ, Liu YF, Guo SB, et al. Comparison of sha-ping ability of five Ni-Ti rotary instruments in simu-lated root canals[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2017,33(3):286-289.
[31] Wu M, Fan B, Wesselink P. Leakage along apical root fillings in curved root canals. Part Ⅰ: effects of apical transportation on seal of root fillings[J]. J Endod, 2000,26(4):210-216.
doi: 10.1097/00004770-200004000-00003
[32] Thompson SA, Dummer PMH. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: part 1[J]. Int Endod J, 2000,33(3):248-254.
pmid: 11307443
[33] Radwański M, Łęski M, Pawlicka H. The influence of the manufacturing process of rotary files on the shaping of L-shaped canals[J]. Dent Med Probl, 2018,55(4):389-394.
doi: 10.17219/dmp/95201 pmid: 30444324
[1] 杨殷杰, 侯本祥, 侯晓玫. R-相热处理镍钛根管锉的力学性能和根管预备成形能力[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(2): 189-194.
[2] 李欣 雷胜 男何祥一. 多桩烤瓷冠修复磨牙弯曲根管的残根[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2012, 39(3): 294-296.
[3] 钟素兰, 尹仕海, 陈朝辉, 揭有琼, 汪莉. Micro-CT 评价不同弯曲度根管预备后根尖偏移的实验研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2009, 36(6): 657-660.
[4] 高波,杨锦波. 弯曲根管预备器械和方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): -.
[5] 张悦,夏海斌,. 碱热处理制备生物活性钛种植体[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2007, 34(03): 216-219.
[6] 杨锦波,李继遥,刘天佳. 弯曲根管的临床预备要点[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(01): 48-50.
[7] 郭继华. ProFile镍钛合金根管预备器械研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2000, 27(03): -.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张京剧. 青年期至中年期颅面复合体变化的头影测量研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 刘玲. 镍铬合金中铍对可铸造性和陶瓷金属结合力的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 王昆润. 在种植体上制作固定义齿以后下颌骨密度的动态变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[4] 王昆润. 重型颌面部炎症死亡和康复病例的实验室检查指标比较[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[5] 逄键梁. 两例外胚层发育不良儿童骨内植入种植体后牙槽骨生长情况[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 温秀杰. 氟化物对牙本质脱矿抑制作用的体外实验研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[7] 杨春惠. 耳颞神经在颞颌关节周围的分布[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] 王昆润. 牙周炎加重期应选用何种抗生素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] 杨儒壮 孙宏晨 欧阳喈. 纳米级高分子支架材料在组织工程中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2004, 31(02): 126 -128 .
[10] 严超然,李龙江. 肿瘤靶向药物载体系统的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .