数字化导板与动态导航在口腔种植应用中的研究进展

doi:10.7518/gjkq.2019.01.018

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

数字化导板与动态导航在临床的应用为以修复为导向、微创、精准地种植提供了便利,两者可辅助医生在术前规划制定种植方案,帮助术者术中避开重要的解剖结构,引导医生在安全的区域内实现微创种植。2种辅助技术虽然都具有较高的精确度,但在使用过程中仍然会产生一定的误差。本文将综合分析比较数字化导板与动态导航的临床操作过程以及可能影响其精确性的因素。

关键词: 数字化导板, 动态导航, 种植, 精确性

Abstract:

With the help of surgical template and dynamic navigation system, prosthetic-driven implant dentistry has become reality. Furthermore, they can help realize minimal invasion and improve accuracy. These technologies might help doctors make preoperative implant planning, and achieve safe surgery by avoiding anatomic structures during operation. While both methods aim to achieve high accuracy, some errors in the clinical application are still detected. This article analyzes differences between the application of surgical template and dynamic navigation in clinics, and factors that may influence their accuracy.

Key words: surgical guide, dynamic navigation, implant, accuracy

中图分类号:

R783.4

张婷婷,胡建. 数字化导板与动态导航在口腔种植应用中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(1): 99-104.

Tingting Zhang,Jian Hu. Research progress on the application of surgical template and dynamic navigation system in implant dentistry[J]. Inter J Stomatol, 2019, 46(1): 99-104.

图/表 3

图1

表1

图2

参考文献 35

[1]	Yazdani J, Ahmadian E, Sharifi S , et al. A short view on nanohydroxyapatite as coating of dental implants[J]. Biomed Pharmacother, 2018,105:553-557. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.06.013 pmid: 29886376
[2]	Preethanath RS, AlNahas NW, Bin Huraib SM , et al. Microbiome of dental implants and its clinical aspect[J]. Microb Pathog, 2017,106:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.02.009 pmid: 28188903
[3]	Harada T, Isomura ET, Uchihashi T , et al. Aspergil-losis associated with migration of a dental implant into the maxillary sinus: a case report[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol, 2017,29(5):448-451. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoms.2017.05.006
[4]	Sun TM, Lan TH, Pan CY , et al. Dental implant navigation system guide the surgery future[J]. Kaoh-siung J Med Sci, 2018,34(1):56-64. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.08.011
[5]	D’Souza KM, Aras MA . Types of implant surgical guides in dentistry: a review[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2012,38(5):643-652. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00018 pmid: 21905915
[6]	Herklotz I, Beuer F, Kunz A , et al. Navigation in im- plantology[J]. Int J Comput Dent, 2017,20(1):9-19.
[7]	de Mello JS, Faot F, Correa G , et al. Success rate and complications associated with dental implants in the incisive canal region: a systematic review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,46(12):1584-1591. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.05.002 pmid: 28552441
[8]	Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L , et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20(11):1191-1199. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01764.x pmid: 22299089
[9]	Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E , et al. Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2007,27(2):141-149. doi: 10.1109/75.761672 pmid: 17514886
[10]	Widmann G, Stoffner R, Keiler M , et al. A laboratory training and evaluation technique for computer-aided oral implant surgery[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2009,5(3):276-283. doi: 10.1002/rcs.258 pmid: 19367613
[11]	Siessegger M, Schneider BT, Mischkowski RA , et al. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2001,29(5):276-281. doi: 10.1054/jcms.2001.0242 pmid: 11673922
[12]	Block MS, Emery RW . Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement: choosing the method of gui-dance[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2016,74(2):269-277. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022 pmid: 26452429
[13]	Emery RW, Merritt SA, Lank K , et al. Accuracy of dynamic navigation for dental implant placement-model-based evaluation[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2016,42(5):399-405. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-16-00025 pmid: 27267658
[14]	dos Santos PL, Queiroz TP, Margonar R , et al. Eva-luation of bone heating, drill deformation, and drill roughness after implant osteotomy: guided surgery and classic drilling procedure[J]. Int J Oral Maxil-lofac Implants, 2014,29(1):51-58. doi: 10.11607/jomi.2919 pmid: 24451853
[15]	Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR , et al. Implant placement is more accurate using dynamic navi-gation[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017,75(7):1377-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026 pmid: 28384461
[16]	Ng FC, Ho KH, Wexler A . Computer-assisted navi-gational surgery enhances safety in dental implan-tology[J]. Ann Acad Med Singap, 2005,34(5):383-388.
[17]	Wagner A, Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W , et al. Computer-aided placement of endosseous oral implants in pa-tients after ablative tumour surgery: assessment of accuracy[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2003,14(3):340-348. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.110812.x pmid: 12755784
[18]	van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W , et al. Ac-curacy of computer-aided implant placement[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2012,23(Suppl 6):112-123. doi: 10.1111/clr.12028 pmid: 23062136
[19]	Block M, Emery R, Lank K , et al. Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2017,32(1):92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026 pmid: 28384461
[20]	Zhao XZ, Xu WH, Tang ZH , et al. Accuracy of com-puter-guided implant surgery by a CAD/CAM and laser scanning technique[J]. Chin J Dent Res, 2014,17(1):31-36. pmid: 25028687
[21]	Takeuchi Y, Koizumi H, Furuchi M , et al. Use of digital impression systems with intraoral scanners for fabricating restorations and fixed dental pros-theses[J]. J Oral Sci, 2018,60(1):1-7. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.17-0444 pmid: 29576569
[22]	Turbush SK, Turkyilmaz I . Accuracy of three dif-ferent types of stereolithographic surgical guide in implant placement: An in vitro study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012,108(3):181-188. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60145-0 pmid: 22944314
[23]	Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Ersoy AE , et al. Clinical ac-curacy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2009,67(2):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.09.033 pmid: 19138616
[24]	Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE . Accuracy of a com-puterized tomography-guided template-assisted im-plant placement system: an in vitro study[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2009,20(10):1156-1162. doi: 10.1111/clr.2009.20.issue-10
[25]	D’haese J, de Bruyn H . Effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally sup-ported stereolithographic surgical guides[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2013,15(3):402-411. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00353.x pmid: 21599833
[26]	Cidade CP, Olate S, Pozzer L , et al. Stress analysis in maxillary all-on-four model[J]. Int J Odonto-stomatol, 2015,9(2):205-211. doi: 10.4067/S0718-381X2015000200005
[27]	Moon SY, Lee KR, Kim SG , et al. Clinical problems of computer-guided implant surgery[J]. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016,38(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40902-016-0063-3 pmid: 4819455
[28]	Lanis A, Padial-Molina M, Gamil R , et al. Computer-guided implant surgery and immediate loading with a modifiable radiographic template in a patient with partial edentulism: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2015,114(3):328-334. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.012 pmid: 26013068
[29]	Widmann G, Stoffner R, Schullian P , et al. Com-parison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2010,25(3):491-498. doi: 10.3171/2011.3.SPINE10425 pmid: 20556247
[30]	Maurer CR Jr, Fitzpatrick JM, Wang MY , et al. Registration of head volume images using implan-table fiducial markers[J]. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 1997,16(4):447-462. doi: 10.1109/42.611354 pmid: 9263002
[31]	Widmann G, Bale RJ . Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery: a review[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2006,21(2):305-313. pmid: 16634503
[32]	Meyer U, Wiesmann HP, Runte C , et al. Evaluation of accuracy of insertion of dental implants and pros-thetic treatment by computer-aided navigation in minipigs[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003,41(2):102-108. doi: 10.1016/s0266-4356(02)00297-8 pmid: 12694702
[33]	Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S , et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005,16(4):495-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01133.x pmid: 16117776
[34]	Widmann G, Stoffner R, Bale R . Errors and error management in image-guided craniomaxillofacial surgery[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2009,107(5):701-715. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.011 pmid: 19426922
[35]	刘喆, 孙国文 . 计算机导航技术在邻近颅底肿瘤病变手术中的应用[J]. 口腔医学研究, 2018,34(4):419-423. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.04.019
	Liu Z, Sun GW . Application of computer-assisted navigation in oral and maxillofacial tumor adjacent to skull base[J]. J Oral Sci Res, 2018,34(4):419-423. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2018.04.019

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

类型	优势	不足
数字化导板	1）与导航相比,下颌无牙颌种植具有一定的优势;	1）导板方面：
	2）可通过引导管辅助控制钻针方向。	①导板制作完成后,术中方案无法改变;
		②导板制作、试戴需要增加患者就诊次数,延长治疗周期;
		③导板的完全就位及稳定性会受周围结构的影响;
		④需要与工具盒搭配使用;
		⑤影响局部种植位点降温及骨屑排出。
		2）医生方面：导板干扰医生视野。
		3）患者方面：
		①导板使用受患者张口度的影响;
		②种植位点间隙过窄影响导板的使用。
动态导航	1）CT拍摄、方案设计与实时引导种植可同天进行;	1）有一定技术敏感性;
	2）由“盲视”转为“直视”;	2）术前需调整校准;
	3）可实时动态引导医生种植;	3）手术器械可能影响医生“手感”;
	4）可实时调整方案。	4）医生需注意自身及器械的位置;
		5）下颌无牙颌术中实时定位受影响。