国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (4): 426-431.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2022075

• 病例报告 • 上一篇    下一篇

以正中关系为中心、面部美学及修复为导向的数字化无牙颌种植修复1例

雒琪玥(),柳叶语,罗依麟,满毅()   

  1. 口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 国家口腔疾病临床医学研究中心四川大学华西口腔医院种植科 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-05 修回日期:2022-04-29 出版日期:2022-07-01 发布日期:2022-06-28
  • 通讯作者: 满毅
  • 作者简介:雒琪玥,硕士,Email:qiyueluo@outlook.com
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2022YFS0041)

Centric relation centered, facial esthetically and prosthetically driven digital workflow for edentulism implant rehabilitation: a clinical report

Luo Qiyue(),Liu Yeyu,Luo Yilin,Man Yi.()   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Dept. of Oral Implantology, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2022-01-05 Revised:2022-04-29 Online:2022-07-01 Published:2022-06-28
  • Contact: Yi. Man
  • Supported by:
    Sichuan Province Science and Technology Planning Project(2022YFS0041)

摘要:

本文提出一种无牙颌种植修复的数字化流程。使用三维(3D)打印的个别托盘和哥特式弓获取与患者软组织最佳匹配的印模及正中关系记录。将锥形束计算机断层扫描,容积数据、印模数据和3D面部扫描数据叠加后,用颅面硬组织、口内软组织和口外面部轮廓创建一个3D虚拟患者。在3D虚拟患者的指导下,以正确的正中关系和数字化微笑设计进行虚拟排牙。所有数据可以在2次临床就诊中采集完成,从而在第3次就诊完成种植手术及临时修复,实现可预测的功能和美学修复。

关键词: 无牙颌种植修复, 数字化流程, 正中关系, 面部扫描, 计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造

Abstract:

This clinical report proposed a digital workflow for edentulism implant rehabilitation. 3-dimensional (3D)-printed individual trays and Gothic arch were used to obtain optimal fit with the patient’s soft tissue and centric relation recording. A 3D virtual patient was created with craniofacial hard tissue, intraoral soft tissue and extraoral facial profile after data superimposition of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) volumetric data, scanned impression data and 3D extraoral facial scan. Tooth alignment was performed in correct centric relation and virtual smile design under the gui-dance of 3D virtual patient. All data could be collected in only two clinical appointments. Computer-guided implant surgery and computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD/CAM) interim prostheses were finished, allowing functional and esthetic rehabilitation in a predictable way.

Key words: edentulism implant rehabilitation, digital workflow, centric relation, facial scan, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing

中图分类号: 

  • R 782.12

图 1

治疗前口内观左:上颌;右:下颌。"

图 2

术后情况左:添加粉色复合树脂后的临时修复体口外观;右:就位临时修复体后口内观。"

图 3

美学效果A:微笑侧面照;B:微笑正面照;C:大笑正面照;D:微笑侧面照。"

1 The glossary of prosthodontic terms: ninth edition[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(5S): e1-e105.
2 Petersen PE, Yamamoto T. Improving the oral health of older people: the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme[J]. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol, 2005, 33(2): 81-92.
3 Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using compu-ter software to ensure precise placement and predic-table prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure[J]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2006, 26(4): 347-353.
4 Joda T, Gallucci GO. The virtual patient in dental medicine[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(6): 725-726.
5 Li J, Sommer C, Wang HL, et al. Creating a virtual patient for completely edentulous computer-aided implant surgery: a dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021, 125(4): 564-568.
6 Li JY, Chen ZZ, Dong B, et al. Registering maxillomandibular relation to create a virtual patient integrated with a virtual articulator for complex implant rehabilitation: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(7): 553-557.
7 Gabriel PM, Mehrad S, Marta R. Virtual 3-dimensional representation of a completely edentulous patient for computer-aided static implant planning[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021 .038.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021
8 Behl N. ITI treatment guide. Volume 4: loading protocols in implant dentistry. Edentulous patients[J]. Br Dent J, 2011, 210(8): 390.
9 Qu F, Du X, Liu WC. 3D-printed custom trays with a Gothic arch for centric relation recording and definitive impression making for complete dentures: a dental technique[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2018, 121(1): 32-36.
10 Watanabe Y. Use of personal computers for Gothic arch tracing: analysis and evaluation of horizontal mandibular positions with edentulous prosthesis[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1999, 82(5): 562-572.
11 Obrez A, Stohler CS. Jaw muscle pain and its effect on gothic arch tracings[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1996, 75(4): 393-398.
12 Mongini F, Capurso U. Factors influencing the pantographic tracing of mandibular border movements[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1982, 48(5): 585-598.
13 Hassan B, Gimenez Gonzalez B, Tahmaseb A, et al. A digital approach integrating facial scanning in a CAD-CAM workflow for complete-mouth implant-supported rehabilitation of patients with edentulism: a pilot clinical study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(4): 486-492.
14 Papaspyridakos P, Barizan Bordin T, Kim YJ, et al. Implant survival rates and biologic complications with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses: a retrospective study with up to 12-year follow-up[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2018, 29(8): 881-893.
15 Per A, Jan A, Johan G, et al. Implant treatment of patients with edentulous jaws: a 20-year follow-up[J]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2008, 10(4): 207-217.
16 Papaspyridakos P, Bordin TB, Natto ZS, et al. Double full-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: outcomes and complications after a mean follow-up of 5 years[J]. J Prosthodont, 2019, 8(4): 387-397.
17 Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2003, 89(6): 611-615.
18 de Wiele Gerlinde V, Wim T, Marjolein V, et al. The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(12): 1489-1494.
19 Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, et al. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2017, 28(5): 602-612.
20 Vercruyssen M, Laleman I, Jacobs R, et al. Compu-tersupported implant planning and guided surgery: a narrative review[J]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2015, 26(): 69-76.
21 Tim J, Urs B, German G. Systematic literature review of digital three-dimensional superimposition techniques to create virtual dental patients[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2015, 30(2): 330-337.
22 Thakur M, Jain V, Parkash H, et al. A comparative evaluation of static and functional methods for recording centric relation and condylar guidance: a clinical study[J]. J Indian Prosthodont Soc, 2012, 12(3): 175-181.
23 Kattadiyil MT, Alzaid AA, Campbell SD. What materials and reproducible techniques may be used in recording centric relation? Best evidence consensus statement[J]. J Prosthodont, 2021, 30(S1): 34-42.
24 Linsen SS, Stark H, Samai A. The influence of different registration techniques on condyle displacement and electromyographic activity in stomatognathically healthy subjects: a prospective study[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 107(1): 47-54
25 Nitecka-Buchta A, Proba T, Proba P, et al. Functio-nal assessment of the stomatognathic system, after the treatment of edentulous patients, with different methods of establishing the centric relation[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2018, 2018: 1572037.
26 Barry R, Hill Edward E. Intraoral gothic arch tracing[J]. N Y State Dent J, 2011, 77(5): 40-43.
27 Krimmel M, Breidt M, Bacher M, et al. Three-dimensional normal facial growth from birth to the age of 7 years[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 136(4): 490e-501e.
28 Tzou CHJ, Frey M. Evolution of 3D surface ima-ging systems in facial plastic surgery[J]. Facial Plast Surg Clin N Am, 2011, 19(4): 591-602, vii.
29 Sforza C, Ulaj E, Gibelli DM, et al. Three-dimensional superimposition for patients with facial palsy: an innovative method for assessing the success of facial reanimation procedures[J]. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 56(1): 3-7.
30 Pozzi A, Arcuri L, Moy PK. The smiling scan technique: facially driven guided surgery and prosthetics[J]. J Prosthodont Res, 2018, 62(4): 514-517.
31 Coachman C, Calamita MA, Coachman FG, et al. Facially generated and cephalometric guided 3D digital design for complete mouth implant rehabilitation: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(5): 577-586.
32 Harris BT, Montero D, Grant GT, et al. Creation of a 3-dimensional virtual dental patient for computer-guided surgery and CAD-CAM interim complete removable and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 2017, 117(2): 197-204.
33 AJDM Costa, Teixeira Neto AD, Burgoa S, et al. Fully digital workflow with magnetically connected guides for full-arch implant rehabilitation following guided alveolar ridge reduction[J]. J Prosthodont, 2020, 29(3): 272-276.
[1] 刘洋. 正中关系的可重复性考察及对其历史和发展的考量[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(1): 1-4.
[2] 詹聃婷, 张帆, 郑立舸. 虚拟颌架的应用及研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(2): 228-232.
[3] 万乾炳. 关于全锆冠的几个问题[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(1): 9-13.
[4] 陈春秀 文学锦. 计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造二氧化锆全瓷修复体的护理配合[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2014, 41(2): 140-142.
[5] 李婧瑜 王艳民综述 白丁审校. 正中关系的研究现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2013, 40(4): 508-510.
[6] 赖依玲 汪永跃 宫苹. 下颌功能性正中偏移与上颌第一磨牙牙龈萎缩的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(6): 656-658.
[7] 万乾炳. 数码全瓷修复技术的现状及展望[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2011, 38(5): 497-501.
[8] 孟艳华,林雪峰,. 颌位关系记录——水平关系记录[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2006, 33(03): 240-242.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .