国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 45-49.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.01.009

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

钛基底表面处理对钛-树脂粘接强度的影响

马志玲1, 刘杰2   

  1. 1.佳木斯大学附属口腔医院修复科 佳木斯 154002;
    2.青岛大学附属医院口腔修复科 青岛 266003
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-12 出版日期:2017-01-01 发布日期:2017-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 刘杰,主任医师,博士,Email：18661801995@163.com
  • 作者简介:马志玲,硕士,Email：306825633@qq.com

Effects of different surface treatments on the bonding strength of titanium and resin

Ma Zhiling, Liu Jie   

  1. 1.Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Jiamusi University, Jiamusi 400 , China;
    2. Dept. of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
  • Received:2016-05-12 Online:2017-01-01 Published:2017-01-01

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

512

摘要： 目的探讨不同钛基底表面处理对钛与树脂粘接强度的影响。方法将纯钛试件随机平均分组：光滑组（A组）、酸蚀组（B组）、喷砂组（C组）、喷砂+酸蚀组（D组）、微弧氧化组（E组）、氮化钛涂层组（F组）。根据以上分组,对试件进行相应的表面处理,用粗糙度仪进行钛表面粗糙度测量,后与Cemerage冠桥树脂结合,扫描电子显微镜（SEM）观察试件表面形貌,能谱分析仪（EDS）对表面元素进行分析,万能试验机检测试件与Cemerage冠桥树脂的粘接强度。结果各组的粗糙度分别为A组（0.370±0.039）µm;B组（1.456±

Abstract: Ojective This study aims at assessing the effect of different surface treatment on bonding strength of titanium and resin. Methods Metal specimens were prepared to divide into six groups randomly like following: polishing(group A), etching(group B), sandblasting(group C), sand blasting and etching(group D), microare-oxidation(group E), TiN film(group F). According to the groups, to treat the metal specimens, and to take one from each group to measure the surface roughness with a roughness machine after that all the specimens were coated with crown and bridge composite resin to fixed area. The fracture surface morphology of the titanium-resin was observed using a scanning electron microscope(SEM) and the energy dispersive X spectrometer to analysis the elemental composition. The shear bond strengths of the specimens were evaluated by a Universal Testing Machine. Results The surface roughness of each group were (0.370±0.039) μm for group A, (1.456±0.044) μm for group B, (2.044±0.019) μm for group C, (1.970±0.047) μm for group D, (0.683±0.023) μm for group E, and (2.195±0.066) μm for group F. The shear bond strengths of each groups were (5.84±0.30) MPa for group A, (10.22±0.63) MPa for group B, (10.78±0.45) MPa for group C, (12.24±0.46) MPa for group D, (13.82±0.61) MPa for group E, and (16.81±0.74) MPa for group F. We can find polymerization porcelain remain on titanium porcelain metal surface of group B to group E, by watching through the results of SEM. Conclusion Sandblasting and etching together, microare-oxidation and TiN film can improve the bonding strength of titanium and crown and bridge composite. resin obviously.

Key words: titanium, resin, microare-oxidation, bond strength

中图分类号: 

  • R783.3
[1] de Almeida-Júnior AA, Fonseca RG, Haneda IG, et al. Effect of surface treatments on the bond strength of a resin cement to commercially pure titanium[J]. Braz Dent J, 2010, 21(2):111-116.
[2] Ban S, Taniki T, Sato H, et al. Acid etching of ti-tanium for bonding with veneering composite resins [J]. Dent Mater J, 2006, 25(2):382-390.
[3] NaBadalung DP, Powers JM, Connelly ME. Com-parison of bond strengths of three denture base resins to treated nickel-chromium-beryllium alloy[J]. J Pro-sthet Dent, 1998, 80(3):354-361.
[4] Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship be-tween sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating[J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1995, 74(2):151-155.
[5] Chien CC, Liu KT, Duh JG, et al. Effect of nitride film coatings on cell compatibility[J]. Dent Mater, 2008, 24(7):986-993.
[6] Taira Y, Hai K, Matsumura H, et al. Adhesive bon-ding of titanium nitride-plated stainless steel for ma-gnetic attachments[J]. Eur J Oral Sci, 2001, 109(3): 204-207.
[1] 王剑. 浅谈嵌体和高嵌体修复的临床应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(5): 497-505.
[2] 沈冬妮,施莹,傅柏平. 后牙牙合贴面修复的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 287-291.
[3] 李米雪子,张琛. 椅旁计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制作髓腔固位冠修复根管治疗后磨牙的临床考量[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 274-279.
[4] 王剑,张鑫. 种植盾构术修复前牙外伤1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2020, 47(1): 10-16.
[5] 陈雪,李纾. 牙颈部外吸收[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(5): 516-521.
[6] 靳志亨,李清. 核瓷和饰瓷厚度变化对全瓷修复体抗弯强度影响的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2019, 46(1): 94-98.
[7] 杜雪,瞿方,刘伟才. 三维虚拟牙科患者的建立及其在美学修复中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(6): 695-702.
[8] 黄璐,钱捷. 三维有限元在嵌体修复中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(6): 728-733.
[9] 祁星颖,郑国莹,隋磊. 钛种植体表面形貌对成骨的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(5): 527-533.
[10] 米梦梦,夏海斌,王敏. 釉基质蛋白衍生物在口腔种植中的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(5): 522-526.
[11] 鄢明东, 夏海斌, 王敏. 上颌窦底内提升不植骨同期牙种植的临床研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2018, 45(2): 238-244.
[12] 魏煦, 杨芸, 张凯, 孙方方. 热压铸瓷面瓷贴面的临床效果评估[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(6): 696-700.
[13] 夏婷, 施斌. 减少粘接固位种植牙冠周围残留粘接剂方法的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(6): 721-725.
[14] 张雅蓉, 刘洋, 张玲, 于海洋. 不同切端设计的上前牙瓷贴面受载能力的定量研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(3): 301-303.
[15] 曹国庆, 王林霞, 杜莉平. 有限元法在桩核冠修复研究中的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2017, 44(2): 209-213.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王昆润. 二甲亚砜和双氯芬酸并用治疗根尖周炎[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 汤庆奋,王学侠. 17β-雌二醇对人类阴道和口腔颊粘膜的渗透性[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[3] 潘劲松. 颈总动脉指压和颈内动脉球囊阻断试验在大脑血液动力学中的不同影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 王昆润. 后牙冠根斜形牙折的治疗[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 杨锦波. 嵌合体防龋疫苗的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 王昆润. 下颔骨成形术用网状钛板固定植骨块[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 汪月月,郭莉莉. 口腔机能与老化—痴呆危险因素流行病学研究[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[8] 丁刚. 应用硬组织代用品种植体行丰颏术[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[9] 田磊. 局部应用脂多糖后结合上皮反应性增生的变化[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[10] 戴青. 口腔念珠菌病的新分类[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .