国际口腔医学杂志

国际口腔医学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 19-23.doi: 10.7518/gjkq.2017.01.003

• ·论著· • 上一篇    下一篇

唇、腭侧联合入路修复牙槽突裂的临床初步研究

鲁勇1, 石冰2, 王志勇1, 李浩1   

  1. 1.南京大学医学院附属口腔医院口腔颌面外科 南京 210008;
    2.口腔疾病研究国家重点实验室 华西口腔医院唇腭裂外科（四川大学） 成都 610041
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-16 出版日期:2017-01-01 发布日期:2017-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 鲁勇,副主任医师,博士,Email：cleft_surgery@sina.com
  • 作者简介:鲁勇,副主任医师,博士,Email：cleft_surgery@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省卫生厅医学科研项目（H201239）; 南京市医学科技发展项目（YKK15117,QRX11125）

Clinical study on secondary alveolar bone grafting by lip side combined with palate side approach

Lu Yong1, Shi Bing2, Wang Zhiyong1, Li Hao1   

  1. 1. Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China;
    2. State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Dept. of Cleft and Palate Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2016-04-16 Online:2017-01-01 Published:2017-01-01

RichHTML

9

PDF (PC)

763

被引次数

2

摘要： 目的探讨唇、腭侧联合入路修复牙槽突裂的临床效果。方法45例先天性牙槽突裂患者接受植骨手术修复,其中21例（年龄9~13岁,平均年龄10.3岁）行唇、腭侧联合入路植骨修复（实验组）,24例（年龄9~14岁,平均年龄11.2岁）行唇侧入路植骨修复（对照组）。术后1~12个月随访,采用临床回顾性研究的方法比较2组术后疼痛、肿胀程度;牙槽突裂植骨成功率评价的临床分级标准一般以Bergland牙槽突裂植骨分级标准进行评价。结果实验组在术后疼痛、肿胀程度均低于对照组;实验组植骨手术成功率81%,对照组植骨手术成功率42%。结论唇、腭侧联合入路植骨修复牙槽突裂手术创伤小、术后不良反应少,临床效果满意。

关键词: 牙槽突裂, 植骨, 修复

Abstract: Objective To assess the clinical effect of secondary alveolar bone grafting(SABG) by lip side combined with palate side approach. Methods The study included 45 cases of alveolar clefts treated with SABG. The experimental group comprised 21 alveolar cleft cases that received SABG by lip side combined with palate side approach(age range 9-13 years, mean age 10.3 years). The control group comprised 24 alveolar cleft cases that received SABG by lip side approach(age range 9-14 years, mean age 11.2 years). Postoperative pain and swelling were recorded and analyzed. After a follow-up period of 1-12 months, the amount of bone in the SABG areas were retrospectively analyzed according to the Bergland scales. Results The occurrence of postoperative pain and swelling in the experimental group was lower than that in control group. A total of 81% of cases in the experimental group were categorized as successful, and 42% of cases in the control group were categorized as successful. Conclusion SABG through lip side combined with palate side approach has a high success rate with a low incidence of complications. This method has satisfactory clinical results with less surgical trauma and postoperative adverse reactions.

Key words: alveolar cleft, alveolar bone graft, repair

中图分类号: 

  • R782.2
[1] Trindade IK, Mazzottini R, Silva Filho OG, et al. Long-term radiographic assessment of secondary alveolar bone grafting outcomes in patients with alveolar clefts[J]. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005, 100(3):271-277.
[2] 杨超, 石冰, 刘坤, 等. 腭侧入路牙槽突裂植骨术的初步应用与评价[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2013, 31 (1):30-33. Yang C, Shi B, Liu K, et al. Initial study and evalua-tion on alveolar bone graft by palate side approach [J]. West China J Stomatol, 2013, 31(1):30-33.
[3] Turvey TA, Vig K, Moriarty J, et al. Delayed bone grafting in the cleft maxilla and palate: a retrospec-tive multidisciplinary analysis[J]. Am J Orthod, 1984, 86(3):244-256.
[4] 邱蔚六. 口腔颌面外科学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2011:430. Qiu WL. Oral and maxillofacial surgery[M]. 6th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2011: 430.
[5] 王秀荣. 早期持续冷敷应用于牙槽突裂患者术后植骨区的疗效观察[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2013, 10(13):23-24. Wang XR. Observation the effect of early continued cold bone area in patients with split of alveolar pro-cess after surgery[J]. Nurs Pract Res, 2013, 10(13): 23-24.
[6] Toscano D, Baciliero U, Gracco A, et al. Long-term stability of alveolar bone grafts in cleft palate pa-tients[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2012, 142(3):289-299.
[7] Meyer S, Mølsted K. Long-term outcome of secon-dary alveolar bone grafting in cleft lip and palate patients: a 10-year follow-up cohort study[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2013, 47(6):503-508.
[8] Feichtinger M, Mossböck R, Kärcher H. Assessment of bone resorption after secondary alveolar bone grafting using three-dimensional computed tomogra-phy: a three-year study[J]. Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 2007, 44(2):142-148.
[9] 张勇, 杨育生, 吴忆来, 等. 牙槽突裂植骨吸收率的测量分析[J]. 上海口腔医学, 2012, 21(3):308-311. Zhang Y, Yang YS, Wu YL, et al. Measurement of the volume absorption of alveolar bone grafting[J]. Shanghai J Stomatol, 2012, 21(3):308-311.
[10] 霍永力, 张雷, 王建华, 等. 脱钙人牙基质材料联合髂骨与单纯髂骨移植修复牙槽突裂的对比性研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2009, 25(4):548-552. Huo YL, Zhang L, Wang JH, et al. Comparison of autologous ilium spongy bone combined with human decalcified dentinal matrix in alveolar process cleft bone grafting[J]. J Pract Stomatol, 2009, 25(4):548- 552.
[11] Helms JA, Speidel TM, Denis KL. Effect of timing on long-term clinical success of alveolar cleft bone grafts[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1987, 92 (3):232-240.
[12] Tabrizi R, Zamiri B, Daneste H, et al. Outcome of bone availability after secondary alveolar bone graft in two age groups[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2013, 24(6):e565-e567.
[13] Upadya VH, Bhat HH, Gopalkrishnan K. Radiogra-phic assessment of influence of cleft width and canine position on alveolar bone graft success: a retro-prospective study[J]. J Maxillofac Oral Surg, 2013, 12(1):68-72.
[1] 汤春波. 无牙颌患者种植治疗修复空间与修复方式的选择策略[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2024, 51(1): 1-9.
[2] 李春洁, 毕小琴, 朱桂全. 口腔颌面部肿瘤患者游离皮瓣修复术的并发症预防及处理[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(2): 127-137.
[3] 木合森·牙生江,买买提吐逊·吐尔地. 带线锚钉在口腔颌面外科的应用[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2023, 50(1): 114-119.
[4] 雒琪玥,柳叶语,罗依麟,满毅. 以正中关系为中心、面部美学及修复为导向的数字化无牙颌种植修复1例[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 426-431.
[5] 张曦丹,孙吉宇,付馨靓,甘雪琦. 介孔硅酸钙纳米材料在牙体牙髓及颅颌面修复领域的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(4): 476-482.
[6] 蔡韵竹,朱姝,刘尧,陈旭. 牙源性干细胞用于治疗神经系统疾病的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(3): 255-262.
[7] 李嫣斐,张新春. 牙本质作为骨修复材料的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 197-203.
[8] 曾芳,王剑. 全锆冠美学修复效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(2): 233-238.
[9] 曹正国. 修复治疗相关的牙周问题考量[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 1-11.
[10] 杨光美,王剑. 全锆冠机械性能的研究现状及与临床应用的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2022, 49(1): 79-84.
[11] 施培磊,于晨浩,谢旭东,吴亚菲,王骏. 牙源性间充质干细胞应用于牙周组织缺损修复的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(6): 690-695.
[12] 沈冬妮,施莹,傅柏平. 后牙牙合贴面修复的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 287-291.
[13] 路泊遥,杨大维,刘蔚晴,梁星. 超短种植体临床应用效果的影响因素[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(3): 329-328.
[14] 陈宸,田雨婷,程立,王国松,胡涛. 儿童第一恒磨牙大面积缺损永久修复时机的考量和展望[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 129-134.
[15] 冯璐,孟文霞. 常见口腔黏膜疾病患者行种植修复相关问题的研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 147-155.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张新春. 桩冠修复与无髓牙的保护[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(06): .
[2] 王昆润. 长期单侧鼻呼吸对头颅发育有不利影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[3] 彭国光. 颈淋巴清扫术中颈交感神经干的解剖变异[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[4] 杨凯. 淋巴化疗的药物运载系统及其应用现状[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[5] 康非吾. 种植义齿下部结构生物力学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(05): .
[6] 柴枫. 可摘局部义齿用Co-Cr合金的激光焊接[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 1999, 26(04): .
[7] 孟姝,吴亚菲,杨禾. 伴放线放线杆菌产生的细胞致死膨胀毒素及其与牙周病的关系[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 458 -460 .
[8] 费晓露,丁一,徐屹. 牙周可疑致病菌对口腔黏膜上皮的粘附和侵入[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2005, 32(06): 452 -454 .
[9] 赵兴福,黄晓晶. 变形链球菌蛋白组学研究进展[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .
[10] 庞莉苹,姚江武. 抛光和上釉对陶瓷表面粗糙度、挠曲强度及磨损性能的影响[J]. 国际口腔医学杂志, 2008, 35(S1): .